FDA announced that the agency has posted on its website a report listing drugs that are being investigated for potential safety concerns.

Even though the Medicare prescription drug benefit has provided access to medications at less-than-anticipated cost to the government—and lower out-of-pocket spending for seniors—many Democrats and consumer advocates want to overhaul the program. Critics contend that the federal government can negotiate prices with pharmaceutical companies that are lower than those obtained by private insurers operating prescription drug plans (PDPs), and some reformers charge that the program is too complex and confusing for elderly beneficiaries, pointing particularly to the infamous "donut hole" that is affecting more Medicare patients than anticipated.

The Comparative Effectiveness Research Act of 2008 would establish the Health Care Comparative Effectiveness Research Institute as a private, nonprofit, nongovernmental entity that would contract with government agencies and private research organizations to conduct systematic reviews, observational studies, and randomized controlled clinical trials to obtain evidence regarding the clinical effectiveness of therapies and treatments.

FDA has launched the Sentinel Initiative to expand and improve medical product risk detection and evaluation. Instead of relying on passive, voluntary adverse event (AE) reports sent to FDA by physicians and pharmacists, the agency would be able to detect safety signals much more quickly through links to health information databases containing information about millions of patients.

The US orphan drug program has demonstrated that economic incentives and regulatory flexibility can spur development of treatments for small patient populations. Since enactment of the Orphan Drug Act (ODA) in 1983, FDA has approved >300 medicines for approximately 12 million patients around the world. However, there are approximately 6,000 to 8,000 rare diseases, so “we still have a very long way to go,” commented Janet Woodcock, director of the Center for Drug Evaluation and Research (CDER), at a May conference commemorating ODA’s 25th anniversary, which was sponsored by the Drug Information Association (DIA).

Healthcare reform is a high-profile issue in the presidential election campaign, and drug access has become a central theme in the debate. Both Democratic and Republican candidates have rolled out healthcare reform plans that promise to cover the uninsured while also providing tax breaks and other incentives to help individuals obtain health insurance.

Much to the surprise of most close FDA observers, Janet Woodcock, MD, agreed in March to resume control of the Center for Drug Evaluation and Research (CDER). Dr Woodcock headed CDER for 10 years before becoming deputy commissioner and, more recently, FDA’s chief medical officer. But when CDER director Steven Galson, MD, MPH, left last year, Dr Woodcock served as the temporary CDER chief. Now, after a long search for a replacement, she has decided to accept the position herself.

At a March 5, 2008, commission meeting, the Medicare Payment Advisory Commission (MedPAC) discussed the feasibility of requiring pharmaceutical companies and medical product manufacturers to report financial relationships and gifts to physicians on a national basis.

The Food and Drug Administration Amendments Act (FDAAA) enacted in September 2007 requires new initiatives to expand information on the risks and benefits of prescription drugs. One goal established in FDAAA is the modernization of FDA’s system for detecting adverse drug events (ADEs); therefore, the current system is being reviewed so limitations and capabilities can be identified.